Yesterday, Joe over at First-n-Main noted several articles written by his associates in various places around the country, each pertaining to Joe’s preferred topic: urban growth and development. I am also interested in the subject, in that it offers a number of ways for one to compare cities. The last article he points to written by Heidi Stout for the Portland Business Journal/MSNBC is interesting, especially since it specifically addresses the significance (or rather, insignificance) of some national rankings, and comparing cities.
If you have read this space before, you know that I personally love these types of rankings. And I especially love mentioning them when Tampa compares favorably. And as a side note, I will also note here when any rankings are unfavorable for Tampa.
Anyway, Heidi notes that the Portland Development Commission tries to compare Portland to “similar areas, such as Minneapolis, Austin, Boise, Sacramento, Phoenix, San Jose, San Diego and Seattle.” When compared to the “clusters” mentioned last week in this entry, you may remember that Portland was said to be most similar to Denver, Orlando, Salt Lake City, and, yup, Tampa.
So, what does it all mean? Perhaps nothing, but it does show that, depending on your point of view, similar is sometimes different in some cities and may not necessarily be similar to the similarities in other cities. Or something similar to that.
Well, that and Joe’s got a great site.