negative on 2008 republican national convention
So last month we learned that Tampa is a finalist for the 2008 Republican National Convention. Actually I found it more facinating to see our two biggest local papers fall all over themselves to tell us about the horror that would be visited upon us were we to host the latest Republican coronat… I mean nomination. Things seems quiet now.
I want to look more closely at an example of unity between historic enemies that the middle east could learn a few things from.
He heads the GOP finance committee in Florida, but Al Austin says everyone wins if Tampa lands the 2008 Republican National Convention. “Even Democrats enjoy spending Republicans’ money,” Austin said Wednesday. “It would be, in my opinion, a terrific thing for the community.” Janet Zink - Times 8/11/05Tampa apparently is going to put in a bid to host the 2008 Republican National Convention. My only disappointment is that so far we haven’t offered to host the next world’s fair. Where is Ed Turanchik anyhow? A world’s fair would be his kind of windmill tilting. Steve Otto - Tribune 8/17/05
Both papers start off kind of nice, poking a little fun. Everybody seemed to remember
the bid for the 2004 convention that fizzled rather early. But some comparisons of the cities show what appears to show better organization in Tampa Bay and dwindling opponents elsewhere. Things get a bit uglier when we all seem to realize that between we actually have a real shot.
The Tampa Tribune filed a lawsuit Thursday to compel the Tampa Bay Convention & Visitors Bureau to disclose its bid for the 2008 Republican National Convention. Carrie Weimar - Times 6/2/06
Hosting the Republican National Convention in Tampa could cost about $124 million, with about $85 million coming from public sources. Ellen Gedalius - Tribune 6/6/06
In trying to lure the Republican National Convention to Tampa during the height of the 2008 hurricane season, officials are rolling the dice that a storm won’t hit while 50,000 delegates, journalists and visitors are in town. Neil Johnson - Tribune 6/11/06
Though an $85-million taxpayer tab for the 2008 Republican National Convention might smack you with some serious sticker shock, Tampa would look great on TV, right? Except for those protesters. What a buzz kill. Sue Carlton - Times 6/12/06
They continued:
Convention Venues Could Lose Revenue
It was unrelenting for most of June. I could find no examples of papers in New York, Minneapolis, or Cleveland voicing similiar concerns. Instead I read about how we might get hit by a hurricane on those particular days. Or how 500,000 protestors would cover the city like flies on a fresh cow pie (incidentally, this number was dropped by a Fire Dept. administrator and picked up by reporters from both papers before Janet Zink at the Times seems to have debunked it with a few phone calls). Both dailies lamented the waste of taxpayer dollars, although the same papers have also reported how local budgets are bulging after 6 years of property tax growth.
My concern is this attitude that the papers have taken - so stridently and uniformly negative. I have to wonder would they be so vehement if the Democrats were thinking of coming to our city?
I don’t really care if the GOP comes here or not, although it would be fun to see them all scrambling if a hurricane does threaten. Plus, if you were to stand on the pedestrian overpass at the end of Morgan St. and timed it right, I bet you can moon all the fancy politician-carrying limos as they drive into the parking garage beneath. There’s just enough clearance so your bare ass will likely be seen on national TV. That might be fun, too.
C’mon and pick Tampa Bay.
Tags: marketing, newspapers, politics, tampa
jason






July 29th, 2006 at 4:39 pm
[...] by jason [...]
July 29th, 2006 at 9:10 pm
We’re anti everything here. Anti progress, anti-WTO, but anti-isolationism and anti-establishment to a degree too.
But no worries, GOoPers and DNsCentors…. You all love money. With or without the convention there will still be money.
July 30th, 2006 at 12:11 am
What concerns you comforts me. It’s good to know that the local papers aren’t going to pull a snow job on how great it would be for Tampa. I can’t help but notice the lack of “benefit” pointed to by yourself. Fact is these things always cost the community an enormous amount of funds that SHOULD be used for any countless of real problems/needs faced by cities every day.
Besides, Republicans suck.
Just my tiny opinion.
t
July 30th, 2006 at 11:42 am
My favorite part: The headline that suggested that the recent Shriners convention would be a litmus test for how Tampa would fare with the GOP convention.
Last I checked, I don’t recall a lot of teargass and riot police needed to keep the public away from those little parade cars as they did figure 8s.
July 30th, 2006 at 7:09 pm
Republican convention: the one week when the free speech zone that is the entire USA is wittled down to some fenced in parking lot in East Tampa.
July 30th, 2006 at 8:29 pm
2008 is 1968 part two. In 1968, all the problems were with the Democratic convention in Chicago, so I’m guessing it will be somewhat similar this time around; anti-war and pro-war Dems jawing back and forth.
I can dream, at least, because 1968 was ten years before I was born and it sounded kinda fun.
July 31st, 2006 at 11:26 am
I have been to a Republican National Convention as a Reporter and to Six Democratic National Conventions as a Delegate 3 times, Reporter 2 times, and a Staff Worker once.
They are great things. BUT, we do not need a 1968 Chicago Rerun in Tampa. The Chicago legacy still remains. Is it the same kind we want for Tampa ? I think not.
I am proud that Tampa has the prestige and facilities to compete for the location, but this is one time it needs to slip away from us.