jilted by the gop

JohnJohn permalink | categories: government, politics, tampa
by John @ 4:39 pm

It’s being reported near and far that the Grand Old Party has decided to hold their potential-king-making bash in the great-white-north instead of the land of the great-white-shorelines.

This can be looked at as a shocking item as some people thought Tampa was a shoe-in for the convention. The state being a crucial battleground and the I-4 corridor being one of the most vital swing regions of the state seemed to all but ensure Tampa’s selection.

Yet, the local media demanded a little light shed on the the local bid for the convention, and what was uncovered was more money expected from the city of Tampa than promised. While the area had a very strong bid, the money-conflicts could easily be looked at as what broke the camels back.

It’s a lot of lost dollars for the tourism industry and other local companies that would have stood to profit from this large undertaking, but it doesn’t ruin the regions voter clout come election day 2008.

Tags: , ,

Possibly related posts (auto-generated)

8 Responses to “jilted by the gop”

  1. Sunshine Editor Says:

    It’s oficial. We have information at State of Sunshine… and The Buzz also has the info.

    There has not been an official announcement.

  2. Sunshine Editor Says:

    Rather I should have said “It’s true” … not official. Oops.

  3. Jason Says:

    Man, no mooning convention delegates I suppose.

  4. dcdave Says:

    i’m so disappointed

  5. Mr. Bill Says:

    It is interesting to note the way the two major papers treated the news.

    The St. Pete Times and their free tbt paper used the negative tones of calling Tampa rejected and a loser.

    While the Tampa Tribune just said it is a No Go for Tampa.

    I didn’t want the convention here because of what I feel will be very ugly demonstrations, BUT I am proud that Tampa was a serious contender for the event. However, having the convention held in Tampa — at the St. Pete Times Forum — would have been a little difficult to handle.

  6. dcdave Says:

    Let’s be realistic, with no real tranportation infrastructure and the national spotlight squarely on us, did we really want this? I for one am glad we don’t have to witness “designated free speech zones” or as they are called in the real world, cages. These conventions are a sham anyway. I’m glad my tax dollars aren’t going towards this boondoggle. Let someone else subsidize the slow suffocation of our democracy.

  7. John Says:

    Dave, I’m with you…

    When we got turned down for the 2012 olympic short list, I wrote a letter to the Times saying we didn’t even deserve it to begin with — the region is too divided and until we settle some of these rifts (political and logistical) we shouldn’t be in the limelight like that.

  8. M Says:

    Is Mary Alvarez a god?

    When the Tampa city council woman was asked about the hurricanes that could threaten a convention, she gave us this gem:

    “We certainly would have made an effort to try and prevent hurricanes from coming,” she said.

    Wow! That’s some trick!

Leave a Reply