<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: hillsborough wetlands now threatened by state</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sticksoffire.com/2007/11/30/proposed-state-law-threatens-hillsborough%e2%80%99s-wetlands/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sticksoffire.com/2007/11/30/proposed-state-law-threatens-hillsborough%e2%80%99s-wetlands/</link>
	<description>A very loose interpretation of the news and happenings in and around Tampa</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 03:40:43 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mariella Smith</title>
		<link>http://sticksoffire.com/2007/11/30/proposed-state-law-threatens-hillsborough%e2%80%99s-wetlands/comment-page-1/#comment-142206</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariella Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 16:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sticksoffire.com/2007/11/30/proposed-state-law-threatens-hillsborough%e2%80%99s-wetlands/#comment-142206</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve discussed this bill with EPC legal staff this morning, and I now see that &lt;strong&gt;it would exempt ALL Ag activities in Hillsborough County from EPC protection — not just ½ acre stuff.&lt;/strong&gt;

The intent is simply that if it is Ag activity as defined by state statute (which includes a lot: logging, beekeeping, fish farming, ornamental plant nurseries, landscape tree farming, and more) then the EPC would not regulate it. Period. &lt;strong&gt;So ALL wetland areas could be filled in on AG land, regardless of size or quality, or any other considerations,&lt;/strong&gt; as long as the state allows it — which they do MUCH more often than our EPC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve discussed this bill with EPC legal staff this morning, and I now see that <strong>it would exempt ALL Ag activities in Hillsborough County from EPC protection — not just ½ acre stuff.</strong></p>
<p>The intent is simply that if it is Ag activity as defined by state statute (which includes a lot: logging, beekeeping, fish farming, ornamental plant nurseries, landscape tree farming, and more) then the EPC would not regulate it. Period. <strong>So ALL wetland areas could be filled in on AG land, regardless of size or quality, or any other considerations,</strong> as long as the state allows it — which they do MUCH more often than our EPC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 4aBetterPlace</title>
		<link>http://sticksoffire.com/2007/11/30/proposed-state-law-threatens-hillsborough%e2%80%99s-wetlands/comment-page-1/#comment-142186</link>
		<dc:creator>4aBetterPlace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 14:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sticksoffire.com/2007/11/30/proposed-state-law-threatens-hillsborough%e2%80%99s-wetlands/#comment-142186</guid>
		<description>We need some new (or actual) leadership! Is Jadell Kerr going run for County Commission? Quality of life, improved education, transportation &amp; growth planning, and preservation of natural space are inseparable!

We must turn the ship.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need some new (or actual) leadership! Is Jadell Kerr going run for County Commission? Quality of life, improved education, transportation &amp; growth planning, and preservation of natural space are inseparable!</p>
<p>We must turn the ship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
